Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different possibilities for teens in light of the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
Almost all of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, which makes it hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are due to smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. It also assumes that folks who smoke don’t intend to do so.
The writer suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a much less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from this is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to have the same effect as smoking cigarettes, without the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers could be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. It also means that they are taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the chance of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the amount of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that people have already seen the negative effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports about the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have a lot of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s vapinger.com true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past few years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we need to do to beat cigarettes is to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so because of other medical issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are plenty of reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it is true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a few of the chemicals found in cigarette smoking are located in the smokes. The author seems to be of the fact that all we need to do to solve the problem of smoking is to reduce the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not based in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing the amount of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.